Closing the books at the end of each period should be easy. Organizations that manage multiple entities face challenges that transform a simple process into a frantic race.
Every new entity increases complexity. Currency conversions, intercompany transactions, chart structures, and various accounting systems all exacerbate problems. Finance teams hunt down information, work late, and manually combine data that ought to flow automatically.
It is insufficient to work harder. The way multi-entity organizations manage their financial closing must be systematically changed in order to improve.
Knowing Where Time Really Goes
Before improving any process, you need to know where time goes. Most finance teams don’t realize how much of their close cycle is spent on activities that don’t add value.
Gathering data often takes longer than analyzing it. Accountants spend hours pulling data from different systems, requesting updates from subsidiary controllers, and waiting for late or missing answers. Actual accounting work fits into whatever time remains.
Fixing mistakes consumes significant effort. When data arrives wrong or incomplete, someone must investigate, identify the source, and correct it. These changes affect downstream steps, forcing rework throughout the process.
Communication costs accumulate quickly. Emails, status meetings, and clarification requests all take time. In multi-entity environments, these messages multiply across locations and time zones.
Standardization Makes Things Work Better
Multi-entity organizations often find themselves with incompatible processes following acquisitions or organic growth. Each entity develops its own schedules, policies, and documentation standards. This variation hampers consolidation.
Aligning the chart of accounts provides the foundation for consistency. When entities use different account structures, mapping and translation become necessary. Standardizing to a common framework eliminates this extra work and reduces mapping errors.
When processes are standardized, workflows become predictable. The corporate team is prepared when everyone adheres to the same close procedures. Different approaches cause delays and uncertainty.
Consistent quality is guaranteed by documentation standards. No matter who prepares them, reconciliations should look the same. Standard templates increase reliability and expedite review.
Technology Makes Scale Possible
Manual processes that work for one entity break down when multiple entities exist. Effective volume management requires technology.
Automated data collection eliminates waiting and chasing. When systems automatically retrieve information on schedule, the close process proceeds uninterrupted. Integrating corporate consolidation tools with entity-level systems removes bottlenecks.
Workflow management creates accountability and visibility. Knowing which tasks are completed, in progress, or blocked enables better process management. Without this visibility, problems only surface after deadlines have already passed.
To make sure nothing is overlooked across all entities, your workflow system should have a comprehensive month end close checklist. Task completion rates increase and the process becomes predictable when tasks are tracked methodically as opposed to via emails and spreadsheets.
Currency translation and intercompany eliminations are handled by consolidation automation without the need for human intervention. These computations are perfect for automation because they are complex but rule-based.
Communication Structures Matter
In multi-entity environments, information flow determines close cycle speed. Poor communication structures cause delays that technology alone cannot fix.
Clear escalation paths enable prompt problem resolution. Everyone should know who to contact and what details to provide when something goes wrong at a subsidiary. Ambiguity causes delays while people figure out next steps.
Defined handoff points foster accountability. Each team transition should have explicit expectations for timing, format, and completeness.
Regular status checkpoints provide early warning. Brief daily updates surface issues while they can still be resolved during close periods.
Continuous Improvement Keeps Progress Moving
Improving the financial close takes time. Long-term progress requires continuous attention and refinement.
Post-close reviews reveal what worked and what didn’t. Each close cycle offers important lessons. Without structured reflection, these insights are lost.
Tracking metrics reveals significant trends. Close cycle length, error counts, and late task completion indicate process health. Monitoring these figures shows whether improvements stick or fade.
Root cause analysis addresses recurring problems. When the same issues keep appearing, quick fixes aren’t enough. Understanding why problems continue leads to permanent solutions.
Building Organizational Capability
Organizations that close fastest and most accurately have built capabilities over time through standardization, appropriate technology, effective communication, and continuous improvement. The end-of-period financial process in multi-entity organizations will never be effortless. But it can be systematic, predictable, and efficient. The path from chaos to control is available to any organization willing to invest in building these capabilities.
Article received on email
