Every corporate boardroom around the world has a standard format for decision making process. Leaders sit around a large mahogany table that has slideshow presentation screens mounted on the walls. The center of the room is covered with spreadsheets going column by column. All of the strategic decisions made in the room such as entering new markets, purchasing out competitors, launching new expensive products are all based off of the correct numbers being in the spreadsheets. Unfortunately most companies make a critical assumption about the spreadsheets, they assume the numbers are 100% accurate.
When financial data quality is poor, strategic decision-making turns into an exercise in blind guesswork.
Financial data quality in organizations is very often treated as if it were an administrative back-office task which has to be carried out by junior accountants in the course of month-end closing. Mistake. This is the financial basis for all corporate strategy. If that basis is shaky then all strategic decisions become risk-laden and often actually ineffective due to the lack of operational and financial flexibility. The resulting failures however are then easy to attribute to ‘strategic mistakes’, rather than to fundamental weaknesses in the organization’s financial data quality.
The Cost of Deciding with Flawed Metrics
When financial data is incorrect, it can cause corporate strategy to go awry. A company may believe that it has sufficient funds to fund a new product or business venture. A company may sign a lease for a new facility or enter into contracts with suppliers or customers, not realizing that the financial data used to support the decision was incorrect. It is not until later that errors in financial data are discovered, such as double counting of invoices that indicated a greater cash position than actually existed.
This issue extends far beyond simple math errors. Poor data quality distorts your understanding of customer profitability, inventory valuation, and departmental overhead.
In the worst cases, an organization’s financial data quality can cause them to unknowingly invest in products that actually lose money. As an example, an organization’s financial data could cause them to incorrectly assign shipping costs to different products. As a result, the organization would incorrectly think that some products are more profitable than others. The organization would then invest heavily in the products that actually lose money. It is only after the organization’s accounting team has completed an audit that they will find that millions of dollars were spent on a strategy that was destined to fail.
The Subsurface Reality of Bookkeeping Documentation
To understand where data quality breaks down, you have to look past the high-level executive summaries and look straight at daily transaction processing. Strategic errors almost always start small. A misclassified expense here, a missing receipt there, or a delayed vendor entry can seem harmless in isolation. However, these tiny anomalies aggregate over time into massive structural discrepancies.
Every high-level corporate decision eventually maps back to the raw records on the backend. If your daily transactions are chaotic, your ultimate strategies will be equally unstable. To fix this, teams must look closely at standard bookkeeping frameworks. Reviewing clear general ledger examples illustrates exactly how every single debit and credit must line up perfectly to create a traceable financial narrative.
When your master records are clean, your financial statements become reliable tools rather than speculative scripts. Leaders can trust that their balance sheets and income statements reflect true operational reality rather than human error or wishful thinking.
Analytical Paralysis and Lost Market Speed
Being fast is better than slow in today’s fast changing markets. To react to rapidly changing market circumstances, sudden shifts in consumer preferences and unforeseen changes in economic circumstances, companies need to be able to switch gears quickly. Financial data quality has a direct impact on a company’s ability to act quickly.
With very poor data quality within a company, people soon start to lose faith in the information that the Finance department produces. As a result, Senior Management are stuck for time whilst they wait for the Finance department to sort out the latest problem. Additional and time-consuming investigations are conducted, sometimes with the assistance of a third party, and the resulting work might lead to changes to models and strategies but this can all take weeks. In the meantime, other competing companies have already launched a similar product, secured key contracts with customers and have established a strong market presence. As a result, the company has been left in the dark ages and it will take considerable time and investment to get back up to speed.
This inability to make timely and correct strategic decisions can further cripple an organization as they are left in the dust of their competitors. While your organization is wasting weeks and even months of time trying to figure out errors in your financial data, and reconcile spreadsheets, your competitors will be launching new products, capturing market share, signing up key clients, and continuing to grow their organizations. In short, poor data quality prevents timely and correct strategic decisions from being made at all.
Complicating Regulatory Compliance and Stakeholder Trust
Strategic decisions sometimes require additional funding or backing of external investors (e.g. banks, venture capitalists, stock issues) to successfully implement a corporate strategy. To secure such additional funding, the company must provide external investors proof of its solid financial base and past performance.
Inaccurate or incomplete financial data makes it very difficult for any company to get through an audit. An auditor may flag items that are seemingly insignificant but, in fact, are misstated or incomplete. This could mean that a company’s financial statements are delayed for extended periods of time.
Investors and lenders often require evidence of a company’s financial health and past performance when they consider investing in or lending to the company. If a company does not have financial data that is reliable, organized and up-to-date, it will be difficult for it to obtain financing through means such as issuing stock or obtaining a bank loan. The company’s financial records must also be accurate and complete in order to avoid incurring public fines and penalties for misstating financial information. If a company is unable to obtain financing due to incomplete or inaccurate financial information, the company’s inability to obtain financing will undermine the company’s credibility with current investors and other stakeholders.
Building a Culture of Data Integrity
To begin with, the problem of data quality needs to be transformed from the way it is viewed today as an ‘IT’ problem or an ‘accounting’ problem within an organization, into an organizational priority that must be driven from the top down.
Incorporating robust automated systems to reduce the amount of manual data input is also key to improving data quality. However, even the best automated systems are only as good as the data that is put into them. As such, every department in a company must realize that the work that they do affects the strategy of the company as a whole. The sales representative who does not log a contract cancellation in a timely manner, or the warehouse manager who does not complete an inventory count on time, is not simply ignoring a bureaucratic process. Rather, they are corrupting the data on which the company’s leaders are basing their strategic decisions.
Every employee must realize that data is a corporate asset. That the information they enter affects strategy. A sales person who doesn’t enter a contract cancellation, or a warehouse person who doesn’t count their inventory on time, are secretly affecting the decisions of the leadership of the organization. By strictly enforcing data standards at every level, the leadership of an organization can rest assured that all strategic decisions are being made with the absolute truth as the basis for that decision.
Article received via email
